Comparison
vs
PsychAssist vs Lightner
A school-evaluation section writer against a platform built for the whole assessment case.
Written by us, about a competitor. Everything attributed to Lightner comes from their own site, linked at the bottom.
At a glance
| PsychAssist | Lightner | |
|---|---|---|
| Reads the full batteryReasons across every measure in the case at once, not section by section | ✓ stated | — not its purpose |
| Intake to signed reportCarries the case from first contact through to the signed document | ✓ stated | — not its purpose |
| Claims trace to a sourceEach clinical claim resolves to the measure, document or note behind it | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Surfaces divergent dataShows evidence that contradicts the conclusion without being asked | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Clinician approval gateNothing enters the record without an explicit, logged acceptance | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Exportable audit trailTimestamp, actor and role on every action, exportable on demand | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Writes in your voiceLearned from your own finished reports, not a house style | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Ambient session scribeRecords and transcribes a live session into the record | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Derived documentsSchool letters, PCP summaries and feedback notes generated from the signed report | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| BAA offeredA business associate agreement is available for PHI | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
“Not stated” means exactly that. Plenty of capable tools do not publish this detail, and we would rather leave a blank than guess on a competitor’s behalf.
Where Lightner is the better fit
- You are a school-based evaluator working under FERPA rather than HIPAA
- You want routine sections drafted cheaply and will do the analysis yourself
- Your instruments are on their supported list
- You want to try something at no cost before committing
Where PsychAssist is the better fit
- You handle PHI and need a business associate agreement and a HIPAA posture
- You need reasoning across the whole battery rather than section automation
- You need provenance, divergence and an approval record for defensible documentation
- You work across clinical as well as educational settings
What Lightner states publicly
- HIPAA and BAA
- Does not claim HIPAA compliance. States that submitted information “will fall under FERPA jurisdiction” because it originates with a school system, that “HIPAA regulations generally do not apply to student records”, and that it is not liable for user mishandling of HIPAA-protected information. No business associate agreement mentioned.
- Data handling
- States AES-256 encryption at rest and HTTPS through AWS in transit. Training on customer data and retention are not stated.
- Claims traceable to a source
- Not stated.
- Surfacing contradictory data
- Not stated.
- Clinician approval step
- Not stated.
Hold both of us to the same questions. The six requirements are published to be applied to any platform, ours included, and how to choose turns them into questions for a demo.
Common questions
- What is Lightner AI?
- Lightner is a report writing tool for educational evaluators, by Ai-ai. It generates content from supported rating scales and cognitive and achievement assessments, automating routine sections while leaving the analysis to the evaluator, and names the instruments it supports on its site.
- Is Lightner HIPAA compliant?
- Lightner does not claim HIPAA compliance. Its compliance page states that information submitted will, in virtually all normal cases, fall under FERPA rather than HIPAA because the data originates with a school system, and that it is not responsible for user mishandling of HIPAA-protected information. If you handle PHI, that distinction matters.
Sources
Everything attributed to Lightner on this page comes from their own published material, read on 1 October 2026. Products change; if something here is out of date, tell us at info@psychassist.ai and we will correct it.
Looking at more than one of these?
See every AI report writer for psychologists, sorted by kind →