Comparison
vs
PsychAssist vs Psynth
Two tools that both produce a full assessment report, differing in whether the draft is generated from uploaded documents or derived from a structured case file.
Written by us, about a competitor. Everything attributed to Psynth comes from their own site, linked at the bottom.
At a glance
| PsychAssist | Psynth | |
|---|---|---|
| Reads the full batteryReasons across every measure in the case at once, not section by section | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Intake to signed reportCarries the case from first contact through to the signed document | ✓ stated | — not its purpose |
| Claims trace to a sourceEach clinical claim resolves to the measure, document or note behind it | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Surfaces divergent dataShows evidence that contradicts the conclusion without being asked | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Clinician approval gateNothing enters the record without an explicit, logged acceptance | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Exportable audit trailTimestamp, actor and role on every action, exportable on demand | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Writes in your voiceLearned from your own finished reports, not a house style | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| Ambient session scribeRecords and transcribes a live session into the record | ✓ stated | ✓ stated |
| Derived documentsSchool letters, PCP summaries and feedback notes generated from the signed report | ✓ stated | ? not stated |
| BAA offeredA business associate agreement is available for PHI | ✓ stated | ✓ stated |
“Not stated” means exactly that. Plenty of capable tools do not publish this detail, and we would rather leave a blank than guess on a competitor’s behalf.
What the choice actually turns on
Both produce a full assessment report. The difference is where it comes from: Psynth generates a draft from the documents you upload, so the synthesis stays with you in the edit. PsychAssist derives the report from a structured case file, which is what makes divergence surfaceable and every claim openable back to its source.
Ask us both the same questions
Put these to Psynth and to us, live, on a case with something messy in it. Marketing claims are cheap and these are not.
- 01Show me the evidence in this case that contradicts the diagnosis - the scores, the instrument, and the session it came from.
- 02Pick any sentence in this draft. Show me the source it came from, and let me open it.
- 03Show me what a clinician approved into this record, and when.
- 04Export the audit trail for this case while I watch.
- 05Your site mentions quality control checks that flag inconsistencies in the uploaded data. Show me that running on a case where the parent and teacher disagree, and show me what reaches the finished report.
We answer all of these, and the table above shows what each vendor states publicly. The demo is where you find out which answers are real. The longer buyer’s guide has the rest.
If you are already using Psynth
Your templates and your scoring workflow come with you - you keep using PAR, Q-global and the rest exactly as you do now. What changes is that the data lands in a case file rather than an upload queue, so the report is derived rather than drafted.
See it on one of your own cases
Bring a case with a contradiction in it - the one where the parent and teacher do not agree - and we will run these questions against it in front of you.
Book a demoWhat Psynth states publicly
- HIPAA and BAA
- States HIPAA compliance and that it signs business associate agreements. Also states GDPR and PIPEDA compliance, SOC 2 Type 2 auditing and ISO 27001 certification.
- Data handling
- States that reports and uploads are stored until you delete them, or 90 days after cancellation, that its AI vendors do not retain data, and that it operates on Google Cloud Platform.
- Claims traceable to a source
- Not stated. The site does not describe claims in the finished report resolving to an identifiable source.
- Surfacing contradictory data
- Partly. The site describes quality control checks that flag inconsistencies in the uploaded data; it does not describe surfacing evidence that argues against a diagnostic conclusion.
- Clinician approval step
- The site describes drafts produced for clinician review and editing. It does not describe a logged approval gate on each extracted value before it enters the record.
Hold both of us to the same questions. The six requirements are published to be applied to any platform, ours included, and how to choose turns them into questions for a demo.
Common questions
- What is Psynth AI?
- Psynth is an AI report writing platform for psychological assessment. You upload test results, intake documents and observations, and it produces a structured draft report for you to review and edit. Its site states support for over 450 assessments, customisable templates and an ambient listening add-on for session audio.
- Is Psynth HIPAA compliant?
- Psynth states that it is HIPAA compliant and signs business associate agreements, and also lists GDPR and PIPEDA compliance, SOC 2 Type 2 auditing and ISO 27001 certification. As with any vendor, ask for the signed BAA covering the plan you are actually on.
- What is the difference between Psynth and PsychAssist?
- Both produce a full assessment report. Psynth generates a draft from the documents you upload. PsychAssist holds a structured case file across the whole workflow and derives the report from it, which is what makes it able to surface divergent data and tie each claim to its source. The practical difference shows up when two raters disagree.
Sources
Everything attributed to Psynth on this page comes from their own published material, read on 1 October 2026. Products change; if something here is out of date, tell us at info@psychassist.ai and we will correct it.
Looking at more than one of these?
See every AI report writer for psychologists, sorted by kind →